How stupid do the
creators of House of Cards think I
am? Or we are?
Actually, the degree of their contempt for
me and every other viewer seems beyond calculation. From the jobs program,
American Works, to Petrov’s kissing the first lady, to the inclusion of the Russian
protest group, Pussy Riot, at a State Dinner, to the convenient hurricane that
appears after Frank appropriates the FEMA bucks, to the predictable veering away
of said hurricane after Frank agrees to return whatever money’s left.
Michael Corrigan must have been the stoic
of the age to slowly strangle without making enough noise to wake Claire. Claire’s
outburst at the press conference made me cringe. No kidding, I wanted to take a
bath.
Does anyone out
there understand the Jordan Valley subplot? What did Frank hope to gain, even assuming
the operation went smoothly? And why would anybody in the administration want
Russian forces on the ground in the first place, must less give a damn if they
pulled out? The U.N. has peacekeeping operations in 16 countries, to which the
Russians have contributed 83 soldiers. Worst of all, the Jordan Valley – the border
separating the West Bank and Jordan - has been occupied by Israel since 1967. There
are now 26 well-established settlements in the Valley, but Willimon expects us
to believe that Benjamin Netanyahu leave their security to a U.N. peacekeeping
force.
I won’t bore you
by continuing this tirade indefinitely, but I do want to have a closer look at one
element the show asked us to swallow. Apparently, Frank intends to finance his
jobs program by eliminating Social Security. What would that entail? At present,
Social Security’s trust fund contains 2.6 trillion dollars in Treasury bonds guaranteed
by the “full faith and credit” of the United States. You might think Frank aims
to snatch the 2.6, but that wouldn’t work unless he somehow convinced the
Congress to redeem them – they’re bonds, remember, - which would increase that
year’s budget deficit by about 500%. But maybe Frank’s got his eye on the
revenue generated by the payroll tax? Maybe he plans to use the revenue stream
generated by the tax to create jobs. If so, he’d be, in effect, asking current workers
who pay the tax to purchase their jobs through the federal government. But what
would he, a Democrat, tell the voters who paid into the trust fund for decades
and are now too old to work. Don’t feel bad, I’m takin’ your Medicare, too?
If it was only
House of Cards, or one of those mindless network cop dramas where the resident
computer geek waves his hand and a giant monitor appears in midair, I’d
probably settle for a regretful shrug. Beau Willimon could have – and should
have –done better. House of Cards - like The Wire or The Borgias, to cite just
two examples - might have been convincing without sacrificing any of the drama.
Willimon decided to go in another direction. The End.
But it’s not
just House of Cards. In a recent speech, Rand Paul said, “When is the last time
in our country we created millions of jobs? It was under Ronald Reagan.” In
actuality, our economy has created more than two million jobs 13 times since
Ronald Reagan left office.
When I read the
quote in Paul Krugman’s NYT column, I felt like someone had spit in my face. I
can live with people who try to get over on me, as long as they’re sneaky. But
when the lie is so brazen that it speaks for itself, I know that I’ve been
demeaned, that the speaker has claimed a superior status. I can disrespect you
whenever I want, he or she proclaims, and there’s nothing you can do about it.
Last night, I paused my DVR on a car commercial:
Lease an Audi A3 for thirty-six months at a cost of $299 per month. Three hundred dollars a month? I can afford that,
right? But then, in smaller letters, the ad when on to inform me that an
additional $2,194 dollars was due upon signing the lease. This raised the total
outlay from $10,764 to $12,958, or $359 per month. That’s a pretty steep jump,
but it was only the beginning, because the next line informed me that “taxes,
title and dealer charges” were still to be added. The first two slices go to
New York State and New York City. This I know. But what exactly is a “dealer
charge”?
I found the
answer in a paragraph at the bottom of the screen. The print was so faint and
tiny that I had to don my glasses and squat down a few inches from the screen
to read it, but that paragraph was why I’d paused my TV in the first place. No
human being could possibly have read it in the few seconds it appeared on the
screen. That’s because it wasn’t meant to be read, despite the FCC deeming the
paragraph to be full disclosure.
As it turns out,
the dealer sets the actual price,
which might be anything. And by the way, this is a low mileage lease, so if you
drive your Audi more than 10,000 miles a year, it’ll cost you an additional twenty-five
cents a mile.
Maybe I should
stop playing the curmudgeon. Maybe I should settle down and get used to it.
Nobody likes a grumpy old man and golden age theories are soooooooooo boring.
Yes, there once existed a militant consumer movement. And, yes, they did
convince the politicians to create full disclosure laws. But that’s soooooooooo
history. Deception is part of the new game and nobody objects to the fake
videos on YouTube as long as they’re well done.
The idea is to win, as all those bankers,
those CEO’s who walked away from the crash with hundreds of millions of dollars
surely did. As Rand Paul surely has. As Beau Willimon laughs all the way to the
bank. And Ted Cruz wins, too, when he tells voters, despite there being, at
most, 25,000 agents at the IRS, “There are 110,000 agents at the IRS. We need
to put a padlock on that building and take every one of those 110,000 agents and
put them on our southern border.”
Everybody loves
a winner. Right?
Yes, everybody loves a winner, and liberals like us keep on losing. Curious that Republicans and Obama are in agreement on a new trade deal and virtually nothing else. I guess big money makes for strange bedfellows.
ReplyDelete