I’ve spent the
past couple of days listening to evaluations of the Georgia 6th
special election from pols, pundits and pals. The overall mood has been doom and
gloom. I don’t know, maybe there’s something about progressives that makes them
enjoy defeat, but my first instinct is to take them by the shoulders (the pals,
anyway) and shake them until they open their eyes. Hey, for God’s sake, look at
the forest (or, at least, the grove) instead of that damn tree. You’ve been
victimized by unrealistic expectations. Again.
Four special
elections have taken place since Trump assumed office, each to replace a Republican
Congressman (no Congresswomen, of course) plucked from the House to serve in
the Trump administration. All were chosen, in part, because they came from safe
districts. Those districts, as it finally turned out, were indeed safe, so
there’s no reason to cry about losing, even in Georgia’s supposedly vulnerable 6th
district. Nevertheless, we need to take a closer look before we throw up our
hands.
Mike Pompeo was
plucked from the 4th District in Kansas to serve as CIA Director. In
2016, he defeated his Democratic challenger by 31%. Trump, at the same time,
won the district by 27%. In April, Ron Estes, the Republican, defeated James Thompson
by 7%.
Ryan Zinke was recruited
from Montana’s at-large District to head the Department of the Interior. A
special election was held on May 23 to replace him. In that election, Greg Gianforte,
the Republican, beat Rob Quist, his challenger, by six points. Trump won
Montana by 27. Ryan Zinke won Montana’s single Congressional seat by 16 points.
Mike Mulvaney
left South Carolina’s 5th to become Director of Trump’s Office of
Management and Budget. In 2016, he defeated his Democratic challenger by 21
percentage points. On June 20 of this year, the Republican nominated to replace
him, won by 3.2 percentage points.
In Georgia’s 6th
District we find the tree everyone’s staring at. Don the Con only beat Hillary
by a single point in the 6th, so why, my friends ask themselves,
couldn’t our nominee for the seat best the Republican candidate? After all,
neither was an incumbent and Ossoff had more money than he could count. Both
true, but we shouldn’t ignore the fact that the odious Tom Price won Georgia’s
6th by 23 points with Trump at the head of the ticket. Georgia’s 6th,
by the way, has been Republican since 1978. That’s 39 years and nineteen
election cycles, in case anyone’s counting.
Unrealistic
expectations lead to painful outcomes. Winning Georgia’s 6th was
always a longshot. Ossoff garnered the same percentage of the vote he received
in the primary while losing to Handel, shaving 19 points off Price’s margin of
victory. When I factor this into the other three results, I’m forced to
conclude that the Democrats are nicely set up going into 2018. That’s not to
say the Democrats have established a platform of their own. Like Hillary, they
seem content to run against Trump and the Republicans. Perhaps they’re afraid
to go positive.
No comments:
Post a Comment